Terrorism in the U.S. Before 9/11/2001

June 12, 2015

Reprise: A Day That Changed The World

June 7, 2015

Fifty-Seven Years and Counting

May 31, 2015

In Memorium

May 23, 2015

That Isn’t The Way It Was

May 15, 2015

Are We Incrementally Giving Up Our Right to Free Speech?

May 9, 2015

Illegitimis non Carborundum

May 1, 2015

How Fear of Disaese Has Changed in My Lifetime

January 29, 2015

Thanksgiving in the 1940s

November 13, 2014

Are We Really Listening?

November 10, 2014

Please reload

Recent Posts

Thanksgiving in the 1940s

November 13, 2014

The Realities of Our Interconnected World

July 18, 2014

How Fear of Disaese Has Changed in My Lifetime

January 29, 2015

1/10
Please reload

Featured Posts

Do We Really Want “Thought Police?”

June 21, 2014

In the 1940s, novelist George Orwell penned a chilling, futuristic novel entitled Nineteen Eighty-Four.  Having observed the expansion of oppressive, totalitarian governments during his lifetime, Orwell projected a future society in which individual freedoms would be forfeited to full control by the state. One of the features of the totalitarian government was a force of people charged with assuring that anyone expressing ideas contrary to the official positions would be silenced. He coined the term, “Thought Police,” to describe this organization.

 

Policing the thoughts of the population has long been a prime totalitarian principle. In Nazi Germany, the thought police were called the Gestapo. In Tsarist Russia, they were the dreaded Okharanka. In Stalin’s Soviet Union, the NKVD (People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs) policed thought. Militaristic Japan of the 1930s and 1940s, the Tokubetsu Koto Keisatsu suppressed improper thought. In Communist East Germany, the STASI (Ministry of State Security) dealt with contrary thinkers. In Mussolini’s Fascist Italy, the function fell to the OVRA.

 

Improper thought could result in severe penalties for the offenders. In Japan, the state’s initial response was “re-education.” In Italy, huge quantities of castor oil might be poured down their throats. In the Soviet Union and Tsarist Russia, relocation to Siberia or a bullet in the back of the brain were common remedies. In Nazi Germany, thought offenses might range from confinement in a labor camp to being hung with piano wire from a meat hook. 

 

When I first heard the term, “political correctness” in the 1970s, a chill ran up my spine. As you may have gathered from my writings, I am a history buff. Having lived seven decades and eight years on this earth, I have personally observed a pretty wide swath of history. The very idea that opinions contrary to popular consensus should be condemned and suppressed is anathema to everything I believe about individual freedom and liberty.

 

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution clearly states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech (emphasis added), or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

 

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution further states that, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated…” Is anything so central to a person than their very own ideas and opinions?

 

To me, the idea that the populous should be coerced into conforming to some conventional wisdom determined by the political elites is clearly a totalitarian concept. To those who would argue that the purposes of “political correctness” are themselves laudable, I would answer that, “the ends justify the means,” is also a totalitarian concept. Read Arthur Koestler’s classic condemnation of totalitarianism, Darkness at Noon, which concludes, “the ends have become the means, and darkness has come over the land.”

 

The Constitution guarantees freedom of speech. There is no constitutional protection of freedom from being offended. Not very long ago, we celebrated the concept of “competition in the marketplace of ideas” in this country. This is not a right-wing concept. When Hillary Clinton was First Lady, she chided college students for shouting down speakers with whom they did not agree. Freedom of speech court decisions have actually cited the quotation once attributed to the French philosopher, Voltaire: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it...”

 

Most people are offended by something. I have written about being offended by excess profanity in today’s speech, but I wouldn’t support a law against it. Like former Virginia Senator Jim Webb, I am offended by the epithet, “redneck.” We are both of Scots-Irish ancestry. The term, “redneck,” originally meant Scots-Irish Protestant supporters of William of Orange in his wars against the Stuart Pretenders. Both Protestant and Catholic militias fought in these wars. The Protestants wore red bandanas to distinguish them from the Catholic militias. The term soon became applied to all Scots-Irish. It was not meant to be disparaging. But neither Senator Webb nor I urge the banning of the word from the language.

 

One further thing that offends me is that defenders of “political correctness” tend to belittle and ridicule those who disagree with them. Their attitude seems to be, if you don’t agree, you are obviously stupid, uneducated, ignorant, or just plain deluded. In adopting such an attitude, they attempt to make their ideas look good by questioning their adversary’s qualifications to even have an opinion. To me, such attitudes are not worthy of respect.

 

To those who might not agree with what I think, I say, “Argue your case and try to convince me that I am wrong.” Compete in the “marketplace of ideas.” Don’t condemn me or belittle me because I don’t happen to agree with you.

 

We do not need “Thought Police!”

 

Note: Warren Bell is a historical fiction author with two novels for sale either for Kindle or in paperback from Amazon.com. Both are set during WWII, with Fall Eagle One taking place in Europe, and Hold Back the Sun set in the war in the Pacific.

Please reload

Follow Us

asphalt and blood

asphalt and blood, fall eagle one, hold back the sun, ku klux klan, new left, patty hurst, symbionese liberation army, warren bell, weather underground, weathermen

bulldozer

d-day

fdr

forgiveness

ken follett

my lai

omaha beach

photo

seabee

social media

social mediaa

twitter

vietcong

vietnam

warren bell

ww2

Please reload

Search By Tags

June 2015 (2)

May 2015 (5)

January 2015 (1)

November 2014 (3)

October 2014 (1)

September 2014 (2)

August 2014 (3)

July 2014 (3)

June 2014 (3)

May 2014 (2)

Please reload

Archive
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square
  • HOME

  • AUTHOR

  • CONTACT

  • BOOKS

  • NEWS & EVENTS

  • REVIEWS

  • BLOG

  • Blog

  • More

    Award Winning Historical Fiction Thriller Author

    Kindle or Paperback

    © 2016 by Warren Bell, Karen Williams, Marketing for Authors

    • Facebook Reflection
    • Twitter Reflection
    • goodreads_icon_32x32.jpg
    • YouTube Reflection
    • Pinterest Reflection
    • Blogger Reflection
    • Tumblr Reflection
    • email-48x48.png
    • amazon-48x48.png
    More About Me

    I am a husband, a father, and a grandpa called "Papa." I make up bedtime stories for my grandkids "on-the-fly" about everything from "Blondie Blocks" to takeoffs on STAR WARS. Like Inspector Morse, I am "a useful baritone," and I have sung in choirs for over six decades. According to Facebook, I was a warrior in a prior life. If you'd like to know more about me, read my full bio.

    Don't Miss Anything

    I write a blog with articles on writing, history, and my background, research, opinions and books. I also send out a periodic Newsletter with updates about my writing and my books. If you don't want to miss a thing, enter your email below.

    Connect!